I have been working in artificial intelligence since
before most people in this industry started using the term.
At NASA’s neurocomputing institute in the 1990s, I built neural
networks. Real ones — not the marketing version of AI, the
engineering version, where you are accountable to whether the
system actually works.
So when I hear that a competitor has moved to a single
generative AI model for data science, I am not impressed. I am
concerned — for their clients.
Let me be precise, because the term AI is being used to describe
two very different things right now. There is true AI — statistical
models, machine learning, expert systems. And there is
generative AI — large language models that synthesize content
based on patterns in training data.
Generative AI is genuinely powerful for what it does. It is not
what statistical modeling requires.
When I am building a model to identify who is likely to respond
to a specific offer, the model needs to find real signals in real
data. Generative AI will generate something that looks right.
But it does not know that the offer is a seasonal promotion, that
there is a 20% coupon on the cover, or what the macroeconomic
environment looks like this mail season.
Humans know those things. Data scientists with domain
expertise know those things. My job — and what we built this
platform to do — is to give those humans better tools, not
replace them with a system that generates plausible-sounding
outputs.
The companies going all-in on generative AI for modeling are
going to see their results fall. Some already are.
Path2Response was built without the co-op playbook. I came
from processing massive, complex data sets for airlines. I had
never built a data cooperative, and I did not want to replicate how
they had always worked.
We embrace data in its natural, unstructured form. No fixedwidth
fields, no translation loss, no signal trimmed at the edges
to fit a predefined structure. Data arrives intact, the models
see it intact, and intact data processed at high recency is where
performance comes from.
We run on elastic cloud infrastructure — hundreds of servers,
thousands of nodes when a client needs it, scaled back down
when they do not. Same-day and next-day model turnaround
is standard. That speed enables iteration: run a model, review it,
adjust it, run it again. The best results come from that loop, not
from a single output handed back after a long wait.
And we let the model work. When clients and brokers overspecify — loading up pre-selects and forcing the model toward
a predetermined answer — performance degrades. When we take those constraints back, apply the right variables, and let
the model find its own signals, it consistently outperforms what human pre-selection would have produced. The model finds nuances that experienced people miss.
That requires human expertise at the front end to provide
context — and then the discipline to step back.
Those results do not come from a generative AI model. They
come from a platform built with the right philosophy, by people
who understand what data actually is.